VectorMethods

Insurance companies

Every claim. A clearer evidence story

Give claims handlers, adjusters and investigation teams a precise view of submitted evidence, from the initial account to the documented repair.

A property professional documents a house from outside.
InsuranceVideoVector
01 / 04

Claim-to-evidence review

Put the submitted account beside the evidence that can support it.

A supplied building-fire claim is compared with a continuous wharf recording, linking visible flames and response activity to retained source frames and the interior inspection needed for a restoration assessment.

Property damage submission

Compare a reported fence change with corresponding footage and prepare a focused inspection request to establish the repair scope.

Motor incident and recovery

Align a supplied collision account with available dashcam and CCTV, retain the sequence and prepare evidence for liability and potential recovery review.

What your team receives

  • Adjuster brief
  • Source-linked incident timeline
  • Targeted follow-up requests

Compare claim descriptions and recorded statements with damage walkthroughs, accident recordings, dashcam, CCTV and adjuster inspections, alongside associated transcripts.

Identify supported details, apparent inconsistencies and missing views. Build an incident timeline with timestamped observations, then generate an adjuster brief and targeted follow-up questions or footage requests.

For motor and liability claims, assemble relevant dashcam and CCTV moments into a source-linked account for liability review and potential recovery from another party.

02 / 04

Cross-claim evidence reuse & pattern screening

Find concrete connections across submitted footage.

A cropped submission aligns with its original source frame, connecting two supplied claim records and shared repairer metadata in a referenced investigation lead.

Reused damage recording

Compare overlapping segments across supplied claim records, showing the matching source intervals even when one copy is cropped or shortened.

Related submission review

Connect a verified footage match with supplied asset or repairer metadata and prepare a referenced lead for an investigator.

What your team receives

  • Aligned matching footage
  • Linked claim identifiers
  • Evidence-backed investigation leads

Compare current submissions with historical claim footage to locate identical or near-identical sequences, edited versions of the same recording and recurring damage scenes presented as separate losses.

Connect evidence matches with supplied claim, claimant, asset, repairer and intermediary metadata to surface potentially related submissions.

Create investigation leads with aligned matching clips, source references and linked claim identifiers. Concrete media relationships support investigation; the reviewer determines their significance.

03 / 04

Policy-relevant evidence review

Connect observable circumstances to the conditions under review.

A timestamped gate opening connects to a supplied protective condition, with attendance and security records identified for the adjuster’s assessment.

Insured-asset check

Compare visible asset details with the supplied schedule and identify where a serial number, registration or additional inspection is needed.

Protective-condition review

Locate the relevant gate or perimeter view and connect visible conditions to the supplied protective-condition clause for adjuster review.

What your team receives

  • Policy-criteria evidence map
  • Timestamped observations
  • Adjuster review questions

Review incident and damage footage, inspection recordings and claim descriptions against supplied policy schedules, conditions and insured-asset information.

Locate visible details relevant to asset identity, usage restrictions or specified protective conditions. Keep the observation distinct from the policy language and record any evidence still needed.

Generate a criteria-linked review report with footage references for the adjuster’s coverage assessment. Policy-specific checks are guided by the supplied conditions and asset record.

04 / 04

Pre-loss, post-loss & repair comparison

Make changes to the same asset easy to review.

Corresponding views of the same fence trace a visible panel change through one recording and identify the approved scope and repair footage needed to review completion.

Fence condition comparison

Compare the same camera’s before-and-after views to locate a changed panel, then retain a pending slot for the property’s repair evidence.

Vehicle repair completion

Match the same vehicle’s inspection and repair views to an approved scope and request a closer view for any item that remains unverified.

What your team receives

  • Corresponding stage comparison
  • Prior-condition and change references
  • Repair-scope review questions

Compare documented baseline inspections, prior-claim footage, current damage videos and repair or restoration recordings for the same property, vehicle or item.

Locate previously documented damage and visible changes in the current submission. When supplied, compare repair evidence with the approved scope and identify completion questions.

Generate comparison reports with corresponding source moments and unresolved questions, supporting review of prior conditions, newly reported damage and documented repair completion.

Insurance

Build around your operation

Start with your source material and the outcome your team needs.

Contact sales Explore all industries